PHPWales 2020 - June 3rd to June 4th

## Comparison Operators

Comparison operators, as their name implies, allow you to compare two values. You may also be interested in viewing the type comparison tables, as they show examples of various type related comparisons.

Comparison Operators
Example Name Result
\$a == \$b Equal `TRUE` if \$a is equal to \$b after type juggling.
\$a === \$b Identical `TRUE` if \$a is equal to \$b, and they are of the same type.
\$a != \$b Not equal `TRUE` if \$a is not equal to \$b after type juggling.
\$a <> \$b Not equal `TRUE` if \$a is not equal to \$b after type juggling.
\$a !== \$b Not identical `TRUE` if \$a is not equal to \$b, or they are not of the same type.
\$a < \$b Less than `TRUE` if \$a is strictly less than \$b.
\$a > \$b Greater than `TRUE` if \$a is strictly greater than \$b.
\$a <= \$b Less than or equal to `TRUE` if \$a is less than or equal to \$b.
\$a >= \$b Greater than or equal to `TRUE` if \$a is greater than or equal to \$b.
\$a <=> \$b Spaceship An integer less than, equal to, or greater than zero when \$a is less than, equal to, or greater than \$b, respectively. Available as of PHP 7.

If you compare a number with a string or the comparison involves numerical strings, then each string is converted to a number and the comparison performed numerically. These rules also apply to the switch statement. The type conversion does not take place when the comparison is === or !== as this involves comparing the type as well as the value.

``` <?phpvar_dump(0 == "a"); // 0 == 0 -> truevar_dump("1" == "01"); // 1 == 1 -> truevar_dump("10" == "1e1"); // 10 == 10 -> truevar_dump(100 == "1e2"); // 100 == 100 -> trueswitch ("a") {case 0:    echo "0";    break;case "a": // never reached because "a" is already matched with 0    echo "a";    break;}?> ```
``` <?php  // Integersecho 1 <=> 1; // 0echo 1 <=> 2; // -1echo 2 <=> 1; // 1 // Floatsecho 1.5 <=> 1.5; // 0echo 1.5 <=> 2.5; // -1echo 2.5 <=> 1.5; // 1 // Stringsecho "a" <=> "a"; // 0echo "a" <=> "b"; // -1echo "b" <=> "a"; // 1 echo "a" <=> "aa"; // -1echo "zz" <=> "aa"; // 1 // Arraysecho [] <=> []; // 0echo [1, 2, 3] <=> [1, 2, 3]; // 0echo [1, 2, 3] <=> []; // 1echo [1, 2, 3] <=> [1, 2, 1]; // 1echo [1, 2, 3] <=> [1, 2, 4]; // -1 // Objects\$a = (object) ["a" => "b"]; \$b = (object) ["a" => "b"]; echo \$a <=> \$b; // 0 \$a = (object) ["a" => "b"]; \$b = (object) ["a" => "c"]; echo \$a <=> \$b; // -1 \$a = (object) ["a" => "c"]; \$b = (object) ["a" => "b"]; echo \$a <=> \$b; // 1 // not only values are compared; keys must match\$a = (object) ["a" => "b"]; \$b = (object) ["b" => "b"]; echo \$a <=> \$b; // 1?> ```

For various types, comparison is done according to the following table (in order).

Comparison with Various Types
Type of Operand 1 Type of Operand 2 Result
null or string string Convert `NULL` to "", numerical or lexical comparison
bool or null anything Convert both sides to bool, `FALSE` < `TRUE`
object object Built-in classes can define its own comparison, different classes are uncomparable, same class see Object Comparison
string, resource or number string, resource or number Translate strings and resources to numbers, usual math
array array Array with fewer members is smaller, if key from operand 1 is not found in operand 2 then arrays are uncomparable, otherwise - compare value by value (see following example)
object anything object is always greater
array anything array is always greater

Example #1 Boolean/null comparison

``` <?php// Bool and null are compared as bool alwaysvar_dump(1 == TRUE);  // TRUE - same as (bool)1 == TRUEvar_dump(0 == FALSE); // TRUE - same as (bool)0 == FALSEvar_dump(100 < TRUE); // FALSE - same as (bool)100 < TRUEvar_dump(-10 < FALSE);// FALSE - same as (bool)-10 < FALSEvar_dump(min(-100, -10, NULL, 10, 100)); // NULL - (bool)NULL < (bool)-100 is FALSE < TRUE?> ```

Example #2 Transcription of standard array comparison

``` <?php// Arrays are compared like this with standard comparison operatorsfunction standard_array_compare(\$op1, \$op2){    if (count(\$op1) < count(\$op2)) {        return -1; // \$op1 < \$op2    } elseif (count(\$op1) > count(\$op2)) {        return 1; // \$op1 > \$op2    }    foreach (\$op1 as \$key => \$val) {        if (!array_key_exists(\$key, \$op2)) {            return null; // uncomparable        } elseif (\$val < \$op2[\$key]) {            return -1;        } elseif (\$val > \$op2[\$key]) {            return 1;        }    }    return 0; // \$op1 == \$op2}?> ```

See also strcasecmp(), strcmp(), Array operators, and the manual section on Types.

Warning

# Comparison of floating point numbers

Because of the way floats are represented internally, you should not test two floats for equality.

### Ternary Operator

Another conditional operator is the "?:" (or ternary) operator.

Example #3 Assigning a default value

``` <?php// Example usage for: Ternary Operator\$action = (empty(\$_POST['action'])) ? 'default' : \$_POST['action'];// The above is identical to this if/else statementif (empty(\$_POST['action'])) {    \$action = 'default';} else {    \$action = \$_POST['action'];}?> ```
The expression (expr1) ? (expr2) : (expr3) evaluates to expr2 if expr1 evaluates to `TRUE`, and expr3 if expr1 evaluates to `FALSE`.

Since PHP 5.3, it is possible to leave out the middle part of the ternary operator. Expression expr1 ?: expr3 returns expr1 if expr1 evaluates to `TRUE`, and expr3 otherwise.

Note: Please note that the ternary operator is an expression, and that it doesn't evaluate to a variable, but to the result of an expression. This is important to know if you want to return a variable by reference. The statement return \$var == 42 ? \$a : \$b; in a return-by-reference function will therefore not work and a warning is issued.

Note:

It is recommended that you avoid "stacking" ternary expressions. PHP's behaviour when using more than one ternary operator within a single statement is non-obvious:

Example #4 Non-obvious Ternary Behaviour

``` <?php// on first glance, the following appears to output 'true'echo (true?'true':false?'t':'f');// however, the actual output of the above is 't'// this is because ternary expressions are evaluated from left to right// the following is a more obvious version of the same code as aboveecho ((true ? 'true' : false) ? 't' : 'f');// here, you can see that the first expression is evaluated to 'true', which// in turn evaluates to (bool)true, thus returning the true branch of the// second ternary expression.?> ```

### Null Coalescing Operator

Further exists the "??" (or null coalescing) operator, available as of PHP 7.

Example #5 Assigning a default value

``` <?php// Example usage for: Null Coalesce Operator\$action = \$_POST['action'] ?? 'default';// The above is identical to this if/else statementif (isset(\$_POST['action'])) {    \$action = \$_POST['action'];} else {    \$action = 'default';}?> ```
The expression (expr1) ?? (expr2) evaluates to expr2 if expr1 is `NULL`, and expr1 otherwise.

In particular, this operator does not emit a notice if the left-hand side value does not exist, just like isset(). This is especially useful on array keys.

Note: Please note that the null coalescing operator is an expression, and that it doesn't evaluate to a variable, but to the result of an expression. This is important to know if you want to return a variable by reference. The statement return \$foo ?? \$bar; in a return-by-reference function will therefore not work and a warning is issued.

Note:

Please note that the null coalescing operator allows for simple nesting:

Example #6 Nesting null coalescing operator

``` <?php\$foo = null;\$bar = null;\$baz = 1;\$qux = 2;echo \$foo ?? \$bar ?? \$baz ?? \$qux; // outputs 1?> ```

### User Contributed Notes 38 notes

127
crazy888s at hotmail dot com
9 years ago
``` I couldn't find much info on stacking the new ternary operator, so I ran some tests:<?phpecho 0 ?: 1 ?: 2 ?: 3; //1echo 1 ?: 0 ?: 3 ?: 2; //1echo 2 ?: 1 ?: 0 ?: 3; //2echo 3 ?: 2 ?: 1 ?: 0; //3echo 0 ?: 1 ?: 2 ?: 3; //1echo 0 ?: 0 ?: 2 ?: 3; //2echo 0 ?: 0 ?: 0 ?: 3; //3?>It works just as expected, returning the first non-false value within a group of expressions. ```
68
arnaud at arnapou dot net
9 years ago
``` [Editor's note: consider using ===] I discover after 10 years of PHP development something awfull : even if you make a string comparison (both are strings), strings are tested like integers and leading "space" character (even \n, \r, \t) is ignored .... I spent hours because of leading \n in a string ... it hurts my developper sensibility to see two strings beeing compared like integers and not like strings ... I use strcmp now for string comparison ... so stupid ... Test code : <?php test("1234", "1234"); test("1234", " 1234"); test("1234", "\n1234"); test("1234", "1234 "); test("1234", "1234\n"); function test(\$v1, \$v2) {     echo "<h1>[".show_cr(\$v1)."] vs [".show_cr(\$v2)."]</h1>";     echo my_var_dump(\$v1)."<br />";     echo my_var_dump(\$v2)."<br />";     if(\$v1 == \$v2) {         echo "EQUAL !";     }     else {         echo "DIFFERENT !";     } } function show_cr(\$var) {     return str_replace("\n", "\\n", \$var); } function my_var_dump(\$var) {     ob_start();     var_dump(\$var);     \$dump = show_cr(trim(ob_get_contents()));     ob_end_clean();     return \$dump; } ?> Displays this -> [1234] vs [1234] string(4) "1234" string(4) "1234" EQUAL ! [1234] vs [ 1234] string(4) "1234" string(5) " 1234" EQUAL ! [1234] vs [\n1234] string(4) "1234" string(5) "\n1234" EQUAL ! [1234] vs [1234 ] string(4) "1234" string(5) "1234 " DIFFERENT ! [1234] vs [1234\n] string(4) "1234" string(5) "1234\n" DIFFERENT ! ```
44
Harry Willis
5 years ago
``` I was interested about the following two uses of the ternary operator (PHP >= 5.3) for using a "default" value if a variable is not set or evaluates to false:<?php(isset(\$some_variable) && \$some_variable) ? \$some_variable : 'default_value';\$some_variable ?: 'default_value';?>The second is more readable, but will throw an ERR_NOTICE is \$some_variable is not set. Of course, this could be overcome by suppressing the notice using the @ operator.Performance-wise, though, comparing 1 million iterations of the three statements  (isset(\$foo) && \$foo) ? \$foo : ''  (\$foo) ?: ''  (@\$foo) ?: ''results in the following:  \$foo is NOT SET.    [isset] 0.18222403526306    [?:]    0.57496404647827    [@ ?:]  0.64780592918396  \$foo is NULL.    [isset] 0.17995285987854    [?:]    0.15304207801819    [@ ?:]  0.20394206047058  \$foo is FALSE.    [isset] 0.19388508796692    [?:]    0.15359902381897    [@ ?:]  0.20741701126099  \$foo is TRUE.    [isset] 0.17265486717224    [?:]    0.11773896217346    [@ ?:]  0.16193103790283In other words, using the long-form ternary operator with isset(\$some_variable) is preferable overall if \$some_variable may not be set.(error_reporting was set to zero for the benchmark, to avoid printing a million notices...) ```
34
mail at mkharitonov dot net
5 years ago
``` Be careful with the "==" operator when both operands are strings:<?phpvar_dump('123' == '       123'); // truevar_dump('1e3' == '1000'); // truevar_dump('+74951112233' == '74951112233'); // truevar_dump('00000020' == '0000000000000000020'); // truevar_dump('0X1D' == '29E0'); // truevar_dump('0xafebac' == '11529132'); // truevar_dump('0xafebac' == '0XAFEBAC'); // truevar_dump('0xeb' == '+235e-0'); // truevar_dump('0.235' == '+.235'); // truevar_dump('0.2e-10' == '2.0E-11'); // truevar_dump('61529519452809720693702583126814' == '61529519452809720000000000000000'); // true in php < 5.4.4 ```
30
thomas dot oldbury at tgohome dot com
12 years ago
``` Be careful when using the ternary operator!The following will not evaluate to the expected result:<?phpecho "a string that has a " . (true) ? 'true' : 'false' . " condition in. ";?>Will print true.Instead, use this:<?phpecho "a string that has a " . ((true) ? 'true' : 'false') . " condition in. ";?>This will evaluate to the expected result: "a string that has a true condition in. "I hope this helps. ```
32
jwhiting at hampshire dot edu
16 years ago
``` note: the behavior below is documented in the appendix K about type comparisons, but since it is somewhat buried i thought i should raise it here for people since it threw me for a loop until i figured it out completely.just to clarify a tricky point about the == comparison operator when dealing with strings and numbers:('some string' == 0) returns TRUEhowever, ('123' == 0) returns FALSEalso note that ((int) 'some string') returns 0and ((int) '123') returns 123the behavior makes senes but you must be careful when comparing strings to numbers, e.g. when you're comparing a request variable which you expect to be numeric. its easy to fall into the trap of:if (\$_GET['myvar']==0) dosomething();as this will dosomething() even when \$_GET['myvar'] is 'some string' and clearly not the value 0i was getting lazy with my types since php vars are so flexible, so be warned to pay attention to the details... ```
39
Anonymous
14 years ago
``` The following contrasts the trinary operator associativity in PHP and Java.  The first test would work as expected in Java (evaluates left-to-right, associates right-to-left, like if stmnt), the second in PHP (evaluates and associates left-to-right)<?phpecho "\n\n######----------- trinary operator associativity\n\n";function trinaryTest(\$foo){    \$bar    = \$foo > 20            ? "greater than 20"            : \$foo > 10                ? "greater than 10"                : \$foo > 5                    ? "greater than 5"                    : "not worthy of consideration";        echo \$foo." =>  ".\$bar."\n";}echo "----trinaryTest\n\n";trinaryTest(21);trinaryTest(11);trinaryTest(6);trinaryTest(4);function trinaryTestParens(\$foo){        \$bar    = \$foo > 20            ? "greater than 20"            : (\$foo > 10                ? "greater than 10"                : (\$foo > 5                    ? "greater than 5"                    : "not worthy of consideration"));        echo \$foo." =>  ".\$bar."\n";}echo "----trinaryTestParens\n\n";trinaryTestParens(21);trinaryTestParens(11);trinaryTest(6);trinaryTestParens(4);?>Output:######----------- trinary operator associativity ----trinaryTest21 =>  greater than 511 =>  greater than 56 =>  greater than 54 =>  not worthy of consideration----trinaryTestParens21 =>  greater than 2011 =>  greater than 106 =>  greater than 54 =>  not worthy of consideration ```
16
hiroh2k at yahoo dot com
15 years ago
``` if you want to use the ?: operator, you should be careful with the precedence. Here's an example of the priority of operators: <?php echo 'Hello, ' . isset(\$i) ? 'my friend: ' . \$username . ', how are you doing?' : 'my guest, ' . \$guestusername . ', please register'; ?> This make "'Hello, ' . isset(\$i)" the sentence to evaluate. So, if you think to mix more sentences with the ?: operator, please use always parentheses to force the proper evaluation of the sentence. <?php echo 'Hello, ' . (isset(\$i) ? 'my friend: ' . \$username . ', how are you doing?' : 'my guest, ' . \$guestusername . ', please register'); ?> for general rule, if you mix ?: with other sentences, always close it with parentheses. ```
13
jeronimo at DELETE_THIS dot transartmedia dot com
15 years ago
``` For converted Perl programmers: use strict comparison operators (===, !==) in place of string comparison operators (eq, ne). Don't use the simple equality operators (==, !=), because (\$a == \$b) will return TRUE in many situations where (\$a eq \$b) would return FALSE. For instance... "mary" == "fred" is FALSE, but "+010" == "10.0" is TRUE (!) In the following examples, none of the strings being compared are identical, but because PHP *can* evaluate them as numbers, it does so, and therefore finds them equal... <?php echo ("007" == "7" ? "EQUAL" : "not equal"); // Prints: EQUAL // Surrounding the strings with single quotes (') instead of double // quotes (") to ensure the contents aren't evaluated, and forcing // string types has no effect. echo ( (string)'0001' == (string)'+1.' ? "EQUAL" : "not equal"); // Prints: EQUAL // Including non-digit characters (like leading spaces, "e", the plus // or minus sign, period, ...) can still result in this behavior, if // a string happens to be valid scientific notation. echo ('  131e-2' == '001.3100' ? "EQUAL" : "not equal"); // Prints: EQUAL ?> If you're comparing passwords (or anything else for which "near" precision isn't good enough) this confusion could be detrimental. Stick with strict comparisons... <?php // Same examples as above, using === instead of == echo ("007" === "7" ? "EQUAL" : "not equal"); // Prints: not equal echo ( (string)'0001' === (string)'+1.' ? "EQUAL" : "not equal"); // Prints: not equal echo ('  131e-2' === '001.3100' ? "EQUAL" : "not equal"); // Prints: not equal ?> ```
20
13 years ago
``` Note: according to the spec, PHP's comparison operators are not transitive.  For example, the following are all true in PHP5: "11" < "a" < 2 < "11" As a result, the outcome of sorting an array depends on the order the elements appear in the pre-sort array.  The following code will dump out two arrays with *different* orderings: <?php \$a = array(2,    "a",  "11", 2); \$b = array(2,    "11", "a",  2); sort(\$a); var_dump(\$a); sort(\$b); var_dump(\$b); ?> This is not a bug report -- given the spec on this documentation page, what PHP does is "correct".  But that may not be what was intended... ```
19
rshawiii at yahoo dot com
13 years ago
``` You can't just compare two arrays with the === operator like you would think to find out if they are equal or not.  This is more complicated when you have multi-dimensional arrays.  Here is a recursive comparison function. <?php /** * Compares two arrays to see if they contain the same values.  Returns TRUE or FALSE. * usefull for determining if a record or block of data was modified (perhaps by user input) * prior to setting a "date_last_updated" or skipping updating the db in the case of no change. * * @param array \$a1 * @param array \$a2 * @return boolean */ function array_compare_recursive(\$a1, \$a2) {    if (!(is_array(\$a1) and (is_array(\$a2)))) { return FALSE;}           if (!count(\$a1) == count(\$a2))       {        return FALSE; // arrays don't have same number of entries       }          foreach (\$a1 as \$key => \$val)    {        if (!array_key_exists(\$key, \$a2))            {return FALSE; // uncomparable array keys don't match               }        elseif (is_array(\$val) and is_array(\$a2[\$key]))  // if both entries are arrays then compare recursive            {if (!array_compare_recursive(\$val,\$a2[\$key])) return FALSE;            }        elseif (!(\$val === \$a2[\$key])) // compare entries must be of same type.            {return FALSE;            }    }    return TRUE; // \$a1 === \$a2 } ?> ```
13
bishop
13 years ago
``` When you want to know if two arrays contain the same values, regardless of the values' order, you cannot use "==" or "===".  In other words:<?php(array(1,2) == array(2,1)) === false;?>To answer that question, use:<?phpfunction array_equal(\$a, \$b) {    return (is_array(\$a) && is_array(\$b) && array_diff(\$a, \$b) === array_diff(\$b, \$a));}?>A related, but more strict problem, is if you need to ensure that two arrays contain the same key=>value pairs, regardless of the order of the pairs.  In that case, use:<?phpfunction array_identical(\$a, \$b) {    return (is_array(\$a) && is_array(\$b) && array_diff_assoc(\$a, \$b) === array_diff_assoc(\$b, \$a));}?>Example:<?php\$a = array (2, 1);\$b = array (1, 2);// true === array_equal(\$a, \$b);// false === array_identical(\$a, \$b);\$a = array ('a' => 2, 'b' => 1);\$b = array ('b' => 1, 'a' => 2);// true === array_identical(\$a, \$b)// true === array_equal(\$a, \$b)?>(See also the solution "rshawiii at yahoo dot com" posted) ```
17
stepheneliotdewey at gmail [period] com
12 years ago
``` Note that typecasting will NOT prevent the default behavior for converting two numeric strings to numbers when comparing them. e.g.: <?php if ((string) '0123' == (string) '123')     print 'equals'; else     print 'doesn\'t equal'; ?> Still prints 'equals' As far as I can tell the only way to avoid this is to use the identity comparison operators (=== and !==). ```
11
Jeremy Swinborne
7 years ago
``` Beware of the consequences of comparing strings to numbers.  You can disprove the laws of the universe.echo ('X' == 0 && 'X' == true && 0 == false) ? 'true == false' : 'sanity prevails';This will output 'true == false'.  This stems from the use of the UNIX function strtod() to convert strings to numbers before comparing.  Since 'X' or any other string without a number in it converts to 0 when compared to a number, 0 == 0 && 'X' == true && 0 == false ```
G
2 years ago
``` Do note, using the ternary operator shorthand (since 5.3), omitting the 2nd expression the first expression will only be called once.Before 5.3 (or not using the shorthand)<?php\$val = f('x') ? f('x') : false;// f('x') will be run twice?>After 5.3<?php\$val = f('x') ?: false;// f('x') will be run once?> ```
13
Cuong Huy To
8 years ago
``` In the table "Comparison with Various Types", please move the last line about "Object" to be above the line about "Array", since Object is considered to be greater than Array (tested on 5.3.3)(Please remove my "Anonymous" post of the same content before. You could check IP to see that I forgot to type my name) ```
Marcin Kuzawiski
4 years ago
``` A < B and still B < A...\$A = [1 => 1, 2 => 0, 3 => 1];\$B = [1 => 1, 3 => 0, 2 => 1];var_dump(\$A < \$B);  // TRUEvar_dump(\$B < \$A);  // TRUEvar_dump(\$A > \$B);  // TRUEvar_dump(\$B > \$A);  // TRUENext - C and D are comparable, but neither C < D nor D < C (and still C != D)...\$C = [1 => 1, 2 => 1, 3 => 0];\$D = [1 => 1, 3 => 1, 2 => 0];var_dump(\$C < \$D); // FALSEvar_dump(\$D < \$C); // FALSEvar_dump(\$C > \$D); // FALSEvar_dump(\$D > \$C); // FALSEvar_dump(\$D == \$C); // FALSE ```
12
kapoor_rajiv at hotmail dot com
10 years ago
``` A quick way to do mysql bit comparison in php is to use the special character it stores . e.g<?php                                        if (\$AvailableRequests['OngoingService'] == '')                                            echo '<td>Yes</td>';                                        else                                            echo '<td>No</td>';?> ```
14
Anonymous
10 years ago
``` Note: The ternary shortcut currently seems to be of no use in dealing with unexisting keys in an array, as PHP will throw an error. Take the following example.<?php\$_POST['Unexisting'] = \$_POST['Unexisting'] ?: false;?>PHP will throw an error that the "Unexisting" key does not exist. The @ operator does not work here to suppress this error. ```
13
gondo
5 years ago
``` beware of the fact, that there is no `<==` nor `>==` therefore `false <= 0` will be `true`. php v. 5.4.27 ```
13
Alex
13 years ago
``` I think everybody should read carefully what "jeronimo at DELETE_THIS dot transartmedia dot com" wrote. It's a great pitfall even for seasoned programmers and should be looked upon with a great attention.For example, comparing passwords with == may result in a very large security hole.I would add some more to it:The workaround is to use strcmp() or ===.Note on ===:While the php documentation says that, basically,(\$a===\$b)  is the same as  (\$a==\$b && gettype(\$a) == gettype(\$b)),this is not true.The difference between == and === is that === never does any type conversion. So, while, according to documentation, ("+0.1" === ".1") should return true (because both are strings and == returns true), === actually returns false (which is good). ```
niall at maranelda dot org
2 years ago
``` Care must be taken when using the spaceship operator with arrays that do not have the same keys:- Contrary to the notes above ("Example #2 Transcription of standard array comparison"), it does *not* return null if the left-hand array contains a key that the right-hand array does not.- Because of this, the result depends on the order you do the comparison in.For example:<?php\$a = ['a' => 1, 'b' => 2, 'c' => 3, 'e' => 4];\$b = ['a' => 1, 'b' => 2, 'd' => 3, 'e' => 4];var_dump(\$a <=> \$b);        // int(1) : \$a > \$b because \$a has the 'c' key and \$b doesn't.var_dump(\$b <=> \$a);        // int(1) : \$b > \$a because \$b has the 'd' key and \$a doesn't.?> ```
azz
1 month ago
``` Keep in mind that ?: operator is NOT fully equal to empty()?: can't check non-existent array index (as describe here https://www.php.net/manual/ru/language.operators.comparison.php#92685) and varsCheck this:<?phpini_set('error_reporting', E_ALL);\$t = [];var_dump(!isset(\$t['z']) || \$t['z'] == FALSE); // true, this that empty() dovar_dump(empty(\$t['z'])); // truevar_dump(isset(\$t['z'])); // false\$v1 = \$t['z'] ?: false; // Notice:  Undefined index: z\$v2 = \$t['z'] ?? false; // silent!var_dump(\$v1); // falsevar_dump(\$v2); // falsevar_dump(!isset(\$non_existent_var) || \$non_existent_var == FALSE); // true, this that empty() dovar_dump(empty(\$non_existent_var)); // truevar_dump(isset(\$non_existent_var)); // false\$v1 = \$non_existent_var ?: false; // Notice:  Undefined variable: non_existent_var\$v2 = \$non_existent_var ?? false; // silent!var_dump(\$v1); // falsevar_dump(\$v2); // false ```
alan dot g at nospam dot net
9 years ago
``` a function to help settings default values, it returns its own first non-empty argument :make your own eor combos !<?php/* * Either Or * * usage:  \$foo = eor(test1(),test2(),"default"); * usage:  \$foo = eor(\$_GET['foo'], foogen(), \$foo, "bar"); */function eor() {    \$vars = func_get_args();     while (!empty(\$vars) && empty(\$defval))             \$defval = array_shift(\$vars);               return \$defval;} ?> ```
10
Hayley Watson
12 years ago
``` Note that the "ternary operator" is better described as the "conditional operator". The former name merely notes that it has three arguments without saying anything about what it does. Needless to say, if PHP picked up any more ternary operators, this will be a problem."Conditional Operator" is actually descriptive of the semantics, and is the name historically given to it in, e.g., C. ```
10
bimal at sanjaal dot com
6 years ago
``` I came across peculiar outputs while I was attempting to debug a script <?php # Setup platform (pre conditions somewhere in a loop) \$index=1; \$tally = array(); # May work with warnings that \$tally[\$index] is not initialized # Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in D:\htdocs\colors\ColorCompare\i.php on line #__ # It is an old fashioned way. # \$tally[\$index] = \$tally[\$index] + 1; # Does not work: Loops to attempt to change \$index and values are aways unaffected \$tally[\$index] = isset(\$tally[\$index])?\$tally[\$index]:0+1; \$tally[\$index] = isset(\$tally[\$index])?\$tally[\$index]:0+1; \$tally[\$index] = isset(\$tally[\$index])?\$tally[\$index]:0+1; /* # These three lines output: Array (     [1] => 1 ) */ # Works: This is what I need/expect # \$tally[\$index] = 1+(isset(\$tally[\$index])?\$tally[\$index]:0); print_r(\$tally); ?> The second block obviously does not work what one expects. Third part is good. ```
11
user@example
15 years ago
``` With Nested ternary Operators you have to set the logical  parentheses to get the correct result.<?php\$test=true;\$test2=true;(\$test) ? "TEST1 true" :  (\$test2) ? "TEST2 true" : "false";?>This will output: TEST2 true;correct:<?php\$test=true;\$test2=true;(\$test) ? "TEST1 true" : ((\$test2) ? "TEST2 true" : "false");?>Anyway don't nest them to much....!! ```
12
fernandoleal at dragoncs dot com
12 years ago
``` If you need nested ifs on I var its important to group the if so it works.Example:<?php//Dont Works//Parse error: parse error, unexpected ':' \$var='<option value="1" '.\$status == "1" ? 'selected="selected"' :''.'>Value 1</option>'; //Works: \$var='<option value="1" '.(\$status == "1" ? 'selected="selected"' :'').'>Value 1</option>';echo \$var;?> ```
Mark Simon
8 years ago
``` The use of 5.3’s shortened ternary operator allows PHP to coalesce a null or empty value to an alternative:\$value = \$planA ?: \$planB;My own server doesn’t yet run 5.3. A nice alternative is to use the “or” operator:\$value = \$planA or \$value = planB; ```
prezire at gmail dot com
3 years ago
``` Take note when grouping ternary operations that return either boolean or integer concatenated to a string:<?php  echo 'hello ' . true ? 1 : 0, //Outputs 1       'hello ' . (true ? 1 : 0); //Outputs hello 1?> ```
j-a-n at gmx dot de
8 years ago
``` Please be careful when comparing strings with floats, especally when you are using the , as decimal.<?phpvar_dump(\$alt);var_dump(\$neu);var_dump(\$alt == \$neu);?>string(9) "590217,73" float(590217,73) bool(false) not the float is cast to a string and then string-compared, but the string is cast to a float and then float-compared. to compare as strings use strval!<?phpvar_dump(strval(\$alt));var_dump(strval(\$neu));var_dump(strval(\$alt) == strval(\$neu));?>string(9) "590217,73" string(9) "590217,73" bool(true) ```
damien dot launay dot mail at gmail dot com
6 years ago
``` I found a nice way to use of new "?:" operator:\$a = array();\$a['foo'] = 'oof';\$b = @ (\$a['foo'] ?: 'No foo');\$c = @ (\$a['bar'] ?: 'No bar');var_dump(\$b, \$c);Output:string(3) "oof"string(6) "No bar"No error is thrown and \$c is set with correct value.Benefit: no need to use isset. ```
sgurukrupa at gmail dot com
5 years ago
``` With respect to using the ternary operator as a 'null-coalescing' operator: expr1 ?: expr2, note that expr1 is evaluated only once. ```
zak at minion dot net
8 years ago
``` be careful when trying to concatenate the result of a ternary operator to a string <?php print '<div>'.(FALSE) ? 'TRUE [bad ternary]' : 'FALSE [bad ternary]'; print '<br><br>'; print '<div>'.((FALSE) ? 'TRUE [good ternary]' : 'FALSE [good ternary]'); ?> yields: TRUE [bad ternary] FALSE [good ternary] this is because the ternary evaluates '<div>'.(FALSE) not (FALSE) - so the end result is TRUE ```
taras dot bogach at gmail dot com
9 years ago
``` Boolean switch usege <?php class User_Exception extends Exception{} class User{   public function register(\$login,\$pass,\$passCheck)     switch(false){       case(strlen(\$pass) >= 5):         throw new User_Exception("Password must be at last 5 chars length");       case(\$pass == \$passCheck):         throw new User_Exception("Password is not confirmed!");       case(strlen(\$login) >= 5):         throw new User_Exception("Login must be at last 5 chars length");       //Do other checks       default:         //Do registration         return true;     }   }   //... } ?> ```
Romain
1 year ago
``` ?? vs isset() with __isset() and __get()<?phpclass A{    public function __get(\$id)    {        return 'a value';    }}class B{    public function __isset(\$id)    {        return false;    }        public function __get(\$id)    {        return 'a value';    }}class c{    protected \$test = "a value";        public function __isset(\$id)    {        return true;    }}\$a = new A();\$b = new B();\$c = new C();echo isset(\$a->test) ? \$a->test : 'nothing'; // "nothing"echo \$a->test ?? 'nothing'; // "a value", isset() is not called!echo isset(\$b->test) ? \$b->test : 'nothing'; // "nothing"echo \$b->test ?? 'nothing'; // "nothing", __isset() is calledecho isset(\$c->test) ? \$c->test : 'nothing'; // throw an Exceptionecho \$c->test ?? 'nothing'; // "nothing"?> ```
mail at markuszeller dot com
9 years ago
``` I prefer writing (!\$a == 'hello') much more than (\$a != 'hello'), but I wondered about the performance. So I did a benchmark: <?php for(\$bench = 0; \$bench < 3; \$bench++) {     \$start = microtime(true);     \$a = 1;     for(\$i = 0; \$i < 100000000; \$i++)   {         if(!\$a == 'hello') \$b++;     }     \$end = microtime(true);     echo "Used time: " . (\$end-\$start) . "\n"; } ?> and it results with # if(\$a != 'hello') Used time: 12.552895069122 Used time: 12.548940896988 Used time: 12.470285177231 # if(!\$a == 'hello') Used time: 7.6532161235809 Used time: 7.6426539421082 Used time: 7.6452689170837 ```
Ryan Mott
2 months ago
``` Searching for "double question mark" operator should find this page (and hopefully after this comment the crawlers will agree) ```